Tuesday, December 3, 2024
Home Blog

Sleep divorce: Why some couples are opting to break up at bedtime – National

0
Sleep divorce: Why some couples are opting to break up at bedtime - National
#image_title



Imagine finally drifting off to bed, only to be jolted awake by a bedquake caused by your partner’s restless leg. Or maybe you’ve just pulled the covers snug around you when they’re yanked away again.

From loud snores to extreme body heat, these common nighttime nuisances have led some couples to try sleeping apart. Known as “sleep divorce,” it’s a trend that’s allowing couples to wake up refreshed and still in a relationship, even if it’s from different beds or rooms.

“Sleep divorce refers to when two people in an intimate relationship decide to have a sleeping arrangement where they’re not in the same bed. They may be in the same room, but technically, they’re just not in the same bed,” explained Dr. Saunia Ahmad, a clinical psychologist and director of the Toronto Psychology Clinic.

“The term divorce obviously has a negative connotation, but it really doesn’t have to be a negative decision.

Story continues below advertisement

“In fact, couples will decide to have a sleeping arrangement where they’re sleeping in separate rooms to improve their sleep and improve their relationship.”

Ahmad said she prefers to use the term “co-regulating” your sleep, as it can be a positive way of coping with the fact that two people have different patterns when it comes to sleeping

So, if you and your partner have been sleeping in separate beds (or have talked about it) for the sake of better snooze, Ahmad says not to worry — it’s quite normal and can even improve the quality of your relationship.


The latest divorce trend


‘He was an acrobat in his sleep’

This is exactly what Dana Infald, 41, and her husband decided to do a few years ago.

Story continues below advertisement

After countless nights of disrupted sleep because of his tossing, turning and snoring, they realized it was time for a change. So, they embraced the idea of sleeping apart to finally get the rest they both needed.

“It was like he was an acrobat in his sleep and over time it got worse. We both realized we weren’t getting sleep, because he would wake me up and then I would wake him up,” Infald told Global News.

Infald, who lives in Toronto, says a “sleep divorce” has been the perfect solution for her and her husband.

The only awkward part? Telling friends and family about their unconventional arrangement.

“If you were to tell a stranger, or post our scenario online on a mommy group or something, I am sure people would assume there is something wrong … but they don’t know the full story,” she said.

“But why torture yourself to make other people happy? You should make yourself happy and not care about what others think. You know you’re in a happy marriage.”


Move over, stop stealing the blankets! Experts say sleeping solo can help couples


Infald is far from alone when it comes to her unconventional sleeping arrangement.

Story continues below advertisement

A 2023 online survey of 2,005 adults in the United States, conducted by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, found that more than one-third of respondents occasionally or regularly sleep in a separate room to better accommodate their partner.

Get weekly health news

Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday.

Ahmad believes that not only are more couples beginning to normalize this practice, but in some cultures, it has long been the norm. For example, in places like India, it’s not uncommon for couples to sleep in separate beds, she said.

“I think is a cultural thing. It’s not uncommon. I think that nowadays what’s happening is that more and more people are open to talking about it. And people have more on their plate recognize that they need to take care of their sleep as well,” she said.

The importance of a good night’s sleep

In 2020, 18 per cent of Canadian adults aged 18 to 64 years and 15 per cent of adults aged 65 years and older slept less than what is recommended (seven to nine hours), according to Statistics Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

Poor sleep is linked with a rise in health conditions, including mortality, compromised immune function, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, mental and cognitive disorders, and accidents and injuries, the Centre for Addictions and Mental Health reports.

And if you are in a relationship, it can exacerbate fights, explained Laura Devlin, a registered clinical psychologist and co-owner of Beachers Therapy Group in Toronto.

“If you don’t have the rest that you need, it affects your emotional regulation,” she told Global News. “You may find yourself getting more irritable, experiencing cognitive fogginess, having less clear thinking overall.

“If you’re disrupting one another’s sleep, then that is only going to add to the tension in the relationship.”


Building a better sleep routine, improving the quality of your sleep


Trying to stay together in bed for the sake of your relationship may only backfire, she added, if you are not taking care of your own physical needs first.

Story continues below advertisement

A 2017 study published in Psychoneuroendocrinology found that people who slept less behaved more negatively and emotionally when their partners had also slept less.

This is because sleep problems can boost inflammation and jeopardize emotional regulation, which may be magnified in couples, the authors argue.

“If people are not sleeping well, their attention span is impacted, their mood is impacted. They don’t show up their best for their relationship or their work,” Ahmad said. “So it has a compounding effect.

“It’s not just the number of hours we need in terms of sleep, but the quality of sleep too.”

If you are hoping to get the ball rolling with separate beds with your partner for the sake of your sleep, Devlin stressed the importance of communication.

Story continues below advertisement

“Communication is the most important, basic foundation for a healthy relationship,” she said. “Whenever you’re thinking about intimate relationships in particular, you want to think about your partner’s attachment need. So attachment theory is a basis for how we understand ourselves as bonded relationships.”

For some, sleeping apart can enhance their sense of security in the relationship. However, for others — particularly those who struggle with insecurity — it may trigger feelings of rejection or abandonment.

If you’re going to bring up the topic and feel it might be sensitive, create space for an open discussion about how both partners are feeling, Devlin explained.

It’s also important to explore other ways to create connection and reassurance, she said, such as sharing a bedtime ritual, reading together or even opting for two separate beds within the same room.

“It’s not just solving the problem of sleep. It’s also about how you make sure everyone feels OK about it emotionally,” Devlin said.

Make sure to spend quality time together

For Infald, communication was key when she and her husband decided to sleep in separate rooms. Another important step was ensuring they still made time for intimacy and meaningful bonding.

Story continues below advertisement

“Before bed, we’ll stay on the same couch and we’ll play Mario Kart or watch something that we both like. Sometimes we’ll go out, or we’ll go to dinner,” she said.

“As long as you have that time before nighttime, then you really don’t feel like you’re missing out.

“You have the cuddles, you have that time to be together, and then you just don’t sleep beside each other, that’s all.”

Of course, sleeping apart may not be for everyone, Ahmad said.

In some cases, sleeping apart can improve the quality of a relationship, she said. However, in others, it might signal deeper, unresolved issues that the couple has yet to address.


Health Matters: Solutions for people who struggle with sleep


“And there is always a concern that with the new sleep arrangement, how it will impact intimacy. Because naturally, people do tend to have more intimacy if they’re sleeping in the same bed together,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

If this is a concern, Ahmad suggested trying separate beds during the week and sleeping together on weekends, reserving that time for intimacy.

Infald, who is pregnant and expecting a baby girl in the spring, explained that because she and her husband have committed to nurturing the romantic side of their relationship, intimacy and connection have never been an issue for them.

“It does not affect intimacy. If I can get pregnant at 40 years old and have my first child, it definitely works,” she said.






Source link

‘Suicide pod’ creator speaks out, rejects claim that 1st user was strangled – National

0
‘Suicide pod’ creator speaks out, rejects claim that 1st user was strangled - National
#image_title



The man behind the so-called “suicide pod” has spoken out, rejecting allegations that the U.S. woman who was the first to die using the device may have actually been strangled.

Dr. Philip Nitschke, a right-to-die advocate with Exit International and trained medical doctor, said Wednesday that while he didn’t attend the woman’s death on Sept. 23 in Switzerland, he did watch it live by video transmission.

The device worked as planned, he said, in the first and only time it has been used.


This photograph shows the Sarco suicide pod, during a media event organised by the “Last Resort”, a Switzerland’s human rights non-profit association focused on assisted suicide, in Zurich on July 17, 2024. The 3-D printed coffin-like Sarco suicide machine, can be activated from the inside by the person intending to die, by filling the capsule with nitrogen, which induces hypoxic death to the occupant.


Arnd Wiegmann / AFP via Getty Images

The “Sarco” pod (short for sarcophagus) has been in the works for years, but up until September had never been used.

Story continues below advertisement

The news of the capsule’s use for the first time made headlines around the world in September, when several people were arrested and a criminal case opened up in connection with its use.


‘Suicide pod’ death in Switzerland sparks controversy


The head of a Swiss affiliate of Exit International known as The Last Resort, Florian Willet, was present at the woman’s death and was immediately taken into police custody, where he remains as police investigate the circumstances around the woman’s death.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Others initially taken into custody, including a journalist for the Volkskrant newspaper in the Netherlands, where Nitschke lives, were later released.

In an interview this week with Swiss newspaper Neue Zuercher Zeitung, Nitschke said he felt compelled to speak out and help Willet’s plight.

He told the outlet that the woman who died suffered with “a very serious illness that involves severe pain” and had wished to die for “at least two years.”

Story continues below advertisement

Nitschke said the woman chose a woodland location for her death and “almost immediately pressed the button” to end her own life after entering the pod.

On Oct. 26, Volkskrant reported the Swiss prosecutor had indicated in court that the woman may have been strangled. The Volkskrant article last month said one of its photographers, two lawyers and Willet were originally detained on suspicion of inciting suicide and providing assistance in doing so.

“It is absurd because we’ve got film that the capsule wasn’t opened,” Nitschke said. “Everything happened exactly as we had predicted. The woman climbed into the Sarco alone, closed the lid without help and pressed the button that released the nitrogen herself. She lost consciousness and died after about six minutes.”

He added that Willet held a mobile phone through which Nitschke watched live video of the woman using the Sarco, and informed the police immediately afterward that she had died.

Nitschke recalled speaking to Willet through the phone at the time, saying: “I was listening and answering his questions and calming him down because it was a very tense time for him.”


Suicide pods now legal in Switzerland, providing users with a painless death


The Sarco pods allow a person to control their death inside the capsule by quickly reducing internal oxygen levels. The person intending to end their life is required to answer a set of pre-recorded questions, then press a button that floods the interior with nitrogen. The oxygen level inside is quickly reduced from 21 per cent to one per cent, and the person is supposed to fall asleep and die by suffocation in a matter of minutes.

Story continues below advertisement

After death, the pod can be used as a coffin, although in this case the capsule was confiscated by Swiss police.


Fiona Stewart, member of the Advisory Board and COO of The Last Resort, a Swiss human rights non-profit association focused on assisted suicide, presents the Sarco suicide capsule in Zurich on July 17, 2024.


Arnd Wiegmann / AFP via Getty Images

Swiss law allows assisted suicide so long as the person takes his or her life with no “external assistance” and those who help the person die do not do so for “any self-serving motive,” according to a government website.

Currently, assisted suicide in Switzerland means swallowing a capsule filled with a cocktail of controlled substances that puts the person into a deep coma before they die.

with files from The Associated Press

If you or someone you know is in crisis and needs help, resources are available. In case of an emergency, please call 911 for immediate help.

For immediate mental health support, call 988. For a directory of support services in your area, visit the Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention at suicideprevention.ca.

Learn more about preventing suicide with these warning signs and tips on how to help.


&copy 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Dave Coulier defends John Stamos bald cap after fans call it ‘shallow’ gesture – National

0
Dave Coulier defends John Stamos bald cap after fans call it ‘shallow’ gesture - National
#image_title



It can be difficult to know how to support a loved one going through a cancer diagnosis — a lesson John Stamos is learning in real time.

In a gesture of support for his friend and Full House co-star Dave Coulier, who was recently diagnosed with “very aggressive” Stage 3 non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Stamos donned a bald cap and helped Coulier shave his head, sharing a carousel of photos to Instagram on Monday night to mark the cancer milestone.

“Nothing like throwing on a bald cap and flexing some Photoshop skills to show some love and solidarity with my bro @dcoulier,” Stamos said in the caption.

Story continues below advertisement

“You’re handling this with so much strength and positivity—it’s inspiring. I know you’re going to get through this, and I’m proud to stand with you every step of the way. I love you.”

Coulier revealed his cancer diagnosis to several publications last week, explaining that when he fell sick with a chest cold last month he was surprised to discover a golf ball-sized lump in his groin that swelled up out of nowhere. He said he’d noticed enlarged lymph nodes in his armpits and neck during past respiratory infections, but this was different.


“It swelled up immediately,” Coulier told Today. “I thought, ‘Wow, I’m either really sick, or my body’s really reacting to something.’”

The father of one shared he is in the midst of doing chemo and is expected to finish his treatment by February.

And while Stamos did what he thought was a kind gesture by cosplaying a bald person while shaving his friend’s head, some fans of the actors pointed out some problematic aspects to the show of solidarity.

“God bless Dave 🙏🏻 but is this really appropriate?” one person pointed out. “A bald cap is showing solidarity? You can just take your cap off and be ‘normal’ again. When people take this route they actually shave their head. I can’t help but feel that you’re using Dave’s diagnoses [sic] as a way to make yourself more likeable.”

Story continues below advertisement

“What a shallow gesture! Couldn’t even cut your hair off for your friend. And you made sure to post it on Instagram to get those likes too,” another person commented.

Get daily National news

Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

“Uncle Jessie could never cut his hair,” another wrote, referencing Stamos’s famous thick, dark locks.


FILE – John Stamos appears at the American Music Awards in Los Angeles on Oct. 9, 2018.


Jordan Strauss / Invision via Getty Images

Others, however, applauded the act and defended Stamos.

“Awwww this is so cute … also, to anyone in the comments.. if Dave isn’t offended by this, you shouldn’t be either. And remember .. John is an actor and may need his hair for his JOB,” one person shared.

“Standing in solidarity isn’t just shaving your head. Don’t be cruel, they are lifelong friends,” another argued.

Story continues below advertisement

In this case, it seems like Coulier really appreciated the gesture from his former TV roommate. Responding to the backlash on Stamos’ post, he took to his own Instagram feed to defend his friend.

“It’s our friendship (me and John) and this is how we are handling a very tough time. I’m a comedian and humor is what drives me,” he wrote Tuesday morning.

“John knows how to cheer me up and I laughed out loud when he arrived wearing a bald cap – being a true loving friend and brother.”

It’s important to remember, however, that just like every cancer is different, every cancer patient is different in how they best feel supported by their friends and family while navigating their difficult health circumstances.

Story continues below advertisement

In forums and social media feeds around the internet, cancer survivors have weighed in on how it made them feel when loved ones offered to shave their heads or alter their physical appearance in solidarity while they were undergoing cancer treatment.

In a blog post for the University of Virginia Health System, one breast cancer patient said she felt very supported when her friends threw her a party and all shaved their heads together.

“It was so fun, and it made it so much easier to be a bald woman surrounded by other beautiful bald women! I still get a little teary thinking about the love and support I felt that night,” she said.

However, the post reminds well-meaning loved ones that the intent of a supportive act doesn’t necessarily mean the impact will line up and, ultimately, you should check in with your loved one on how they will best feel supported.

“I wore a wig so I wouldn’t have to feel like a cancer patient every time I looked in the mirror,” another cancer survivor explained in the post. “If someone (shaved their head) for me, I’d be reminded of the cancer every time I looked at them.”


New study highlights Canadian men’s need for proactive health care


Curator Recommendations

&copy 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Looking to escape politics for the next 4 years? This cruise has you covered – National

0
Looking to escape politics for the next 4 years? This cruise has you covered - National
#image_title



Are you an unhappy voter looking to escape the fallout of an election, whether it’s a certain election that just happened south of the border, a local mayoral election or even your condo board? Well, one cruise company wants to help you get away for the next four years.

Villa Vie Residences announced this month it’s starting to offer around-the-world sailing adventures aboard the Villa Vie Odyssey cruise ship that can last as long as four years and allow guests to avoid whatever is happening on home soil, at least temporarily.

And while the company did not directly mention the U.S. presidential election in its press release announcing the “Tour La Vie” package, it’s clear from the cheeky marketing materials that they’re targeting U.S. residents eager to escape the country’s electoral realities.

Those interested can join a four-year “Skip Forward” package, a three-year “Everywhere but Home” package, a two-year “Mid-Term Selection” package and a one-year “Escape from Reality” package.

Story continues below advertisement


A view of the Villa Vie Odyssey pool deck.


Courtesy / Villa Vie Residences

A company spokesperson, speaking to Quartz, said the offering isn’t “meant to stir political uproar but to offer a real way for people who are disappointed with the election results to get away from reality.”

Get daily National news

Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

The ship aims to circumnavigate the globe every three-and-a-half years, making stops in more than 400 destinations. The boat can hold up to 600 travellers and just entered its second month of a 15-year around-the-world tour, which will take it to all seven continents, 13 “Wonders of the World” and more than 100 tropical islands.

The ship will spend early 2025 circling the South American continent from the Pacific to the Atlantic, returning to the Caribbean, transiting the Panama Canal, through Central America to California, Hawaii and Alaska by summer. The ship will continue to Asia in the fall and reach Australia by early November, spending much of next winter in French Polynesia, the Cook Islands and Fiji.

Story continues below advertisement

The price for this level of peace means coughing up some major moolah: Packages range from US$40,000, but it costs US$255,999 for one person to have their own room for four years and US$159,999 per person for a double occupancy room for four years.


A view of a Deluxe Balcony room on the Villa Vie Odyssey.


Courtesy / Villa Vie Residences

The company also offers full or fractional ownership options, unlimited access options, or a “pay as you go” option that allows for shorter stays. Friends and family can also join as long-term stay guests for a per-night rate that’s based on the ownership or cruise length package.

Anne Alms, Villa Vie’s head of sales, said in a press release that the company’s cruise “offers a unique, one-of-a-kind way see the whole world at a slow pace where you have enough time to actually experience the cultural vibe of every port.”


&copy 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

From 300 lbs to 100K races: How this mom of 4 took up ultramarathons

0
From 300 lbs to 100K races: How this mom of 4 took up ultramarathons
#image_title



Jessica McBride, pushing 300 pounds after the birth of her third child in 2015, was overweight and had to change.

“I realized that I needed to be around for my three children and to do that I had to prioritize my own health.

“I decided that I needed to lose weight.”


Alberta mom Jessica McBride was pushing 300 pounds after the birth of her third child in 2015.


Supplied

McBride dropped about half of her body weight in a stunning half a year, down to around 140 pounds, by changing her diet.

Story continues below advertisement

She said she did some exercise like high-intensity interval training (HIIT) but didn’t get into significant cardiovascular exercise during those six months.

“It gave me the confidence to move forward and to try to do other things with my life.”


Alberta mom Jessica McBride went from pushing 300 pounds in 2015 to running 100-kilometre ultramarathons in a shockingly short amount of time.


Supplied

After dropping the weight, she took up running.

“I felt really silly when I started,” the 33-year-old St. Albert, Alta., mother said.

“I felt like the whole world was staring at me and how not good at this I was.”

Building up physical endurance was one thing, but there was an even bigger mental hurdle to overcome: McBride battled childhood insecurities along the way, explaining she had a gym teacher who belittled her running in front of the class.

Story continues below advertisement

“I would not run after that because I internalized what that adult had told me — was that I was not a runner. And I believe that until I was an adult and I decided, no, I am going to challenge this.”


Alberta ultramarathon runner Jessica McBride at the Edmonton Marathon.


Supplied

Her dad had done triathlons and her mom was a long-distance runner, so McBride followed in their footsteps first with the weight loss, and then with race training.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

“I’m very fortunate that I am single-minded. I am my mother’s child that way,” McBride said. “I was able to get that done pretty quickly.”

Step by step, her strength grew. She did a couch-to-5K program and progressed from there.

“I have these three little girls that I have to model for, for the rest of my life. And do I want them to believe that they have to listen to the opinions of other people to form their idea of who they are? I didn’t want that for them, which means I have to lead by example.”

Story continues below advertisement

“I think everyone, in different areas of their lives, they allow other people to tell them who they are — for better or for worse. And I think we need to challenge those things.”

One year after she picked up running, McBride took part in her first marathon in Red Deer. A month afterwards, she ran in Banff, and later that year, in a marathon in Edmonton.

5Ks were a walk in the park and a full marathon was fun but McBride wanted more — which is how she ended up in the world of ultramarathon running.

“I decided there has to be more, because what I love about long-distance running is that there is no limit except what you put on it.”

She signed up for the Whistler50 and a mere four months after her first marathon, took on the 80-kilometre ultramarathon. Then, she upped it to 100 kilometres.

“The 100K is that sweet spot where you can open it up. You can still keep it in the four-minute kilometres and have a great time and not necessarily wreck yourself — maybe you will. You never know,” McBride said with a laugh.


Alberta ultramarathon runner Jessica McBride running in a winter race.


Supplied

She cautioned one must do their research on nutrition and knowing their body in a race, and recommends training and conditioning their body for about two years before attempting a 100K race.

Story continues below advertisement

As a now mother of four, she said there is peace in knowing her ability to run long distances is something she has achieved all by herself — for herself.

“I find that that’s very helpful for me — not just as a mom, but like as a woman today. There’s a lot of areas where women are told, OK, well, you’re not supposed to take up space here…. I find that running is really helpful that way.”

So how does a busy mom do it?

“You marry an understanding man is how you do it,” she laughed, saying her partner is an active parent who keeps the family life going (she has had a son since she began running) when she has a busy training schedule. Her mom also helps out with the kids so McBride has the time for things like long runs, which can take hours to complete.

“We have great family support.”


An undated photo of Alberta mom Jessica McBride with her family.


Supplied

Now, she’s headed to her first global competition. Next month, McBride will represent Canada at the International Association of Ultrarunners‘ 100 km World Championship.

Story continues below advertisement

It’s in Bangalore, a tropical city in southern India where the average daytime temperature in December ranges from a high of 27 C to a low of 16 C, plus a relative humidity of around 55 per cent.

“She’s going to be warm,” McBride laughed.

She’s a member of the Association of Canadian Ultramarathon Runners and said they’ve provided her with protocols for acclimatizing to a hot climate, including three weeks of intense sauna sessions followed by running indoors in winter gear to help simulate the environment and increase blood hemoglobin.

“It’ll be into the sauna, on the treadmill, into the sauna, on the treadmill. It’ll be grand. It’ll be a great time,” she joked.

Crossing the finish line next month will be a bucket-list moment for McBride, who admitted she is competitive and has many goals.

“I promised myself before I was 40, I would run for my country. And I have made it. I will be 33 years old.”

There isn’t anything special to it and anyone who is healthy and able-bodied can run if they put their mind to it, McBride said.

“It just takes the belief in yourself and I think that that’s what a lot of people lack. They don’t believe that they can do it and that’s why they don’t ever pursue doing it. And obviously there’s people who won’t be interested in doing it. And God bless them, they’re going to have less injuries than me,” she laughed.

Story continues below advertisement

“But I think that self-belief is a huge thing for people.”

The Association of Canadian Ultramarathoners has a lot of information available to anyone who is interested in attempting longer distances, she said.

“If anyone is interested in getting into it, I believe they can. I give them my vote of confidence that they can do it if they put in the work.”

Curator Recommendations

&copy 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

The 4B movement: Why some U.S. women are boycotting men after Trump’s win – National

0
The 4B movement: Why some U.S. women are boycotting men after Trump’s win - National
#image_title



U.S. women dissatisfied with the re-election of Donald Trump are taking a sudden interest in a feminist movement that started in South Korea and encourages the rejection of heterosexual marriage, sex, childbirth and dating.

The 4B movement, as it’s called, began in South Korea when women started swearing off heterosexual dating in protest of misogyny in the Asian country. While it’s hard to pin down the start of 4B, it’s believed to have begun around 2017, but gained traction in 2018 when protests erupted around the country in response to a spy cam epidemic and grew into a #MeToo-esque feminist phenomenon.

On Wednesday, Google searches for “4B” spiked by 450 per cent in the U.S., with the most interest coming from Washington D.C., Colorado, Vermont and Minnesota. More than half-a-million search inquiries in the span of 48 hours shot the term high into trending results on the search giant.

Story continues below advertisement


A glimpse of how the term “4B movement” spiked in Google searches this week.


Global News

Meanwhile, hundreds of videos from U.S. content creators have popped up on TikTok, with women disappointed by Tuesday’s results vowing to participate in their own version of 4B.

What 4B stands for

The 4B movement stands for four Korean words beginning with “bi” or “no” in English: bihon means no heterosexual marriage; bichulsan, no childbirth; biyeonae, no dating; and bisekseu, no heterosexual sexual relationships.

Supporters of the movement may refuse to date, marry, have children or have sex (or any combination of these), effectively boycotting a system they feel prioritizes gender inequality.

And while some participants might want to have marriage and children, they believe the risks of having to conform to traditional gender roles outweigh the benefits of starting a family.

Story continues below advertisement

@wtfaleisa

Replying to @user9720585462941 its my roman empire

♬ original sound – wtfaleisa

While the movement first started in response to revenge porn and spy cams targeting South Korean women, it’s become a rallying cry for other existential threats: access to abortion and quality health care, the gender pay gap, intimate partner violence and more.

Essentially, women are sending a message that if violence and inequality against them does not stop, they will ensure the birth rate falls.

“It’s a new lifestyle focused on building safe communities, both online and in-person. What we want is not to be labelled simply as some man’s wife or girlfriend, but to have the independence to be free from the societal expectations that often limit women’s potential to be fully acknowledged as human beings,” Haein Shim, a South Korean activist, told The Guardian, emphasizing that the movement goes beyond just boycotting men and sex, and encourages participants to find solidarity and community with each other.

Shim said being a participant in the movement has brought backlash and she and other women have faced harassment, stalking, cyberbullying and threats of violence.

“Many of us wore masks, sunglasses and hats to cover our faces, and it was common practice to dress differently before and after a protest to minimize being stalked.”

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

How big is the 4B movement?

While 4B is seeing a big spike in interest in North America, it’s difficult to determine how widespread it’s become in South Korea given its largely anonymous nature. It also reaches into both online and offline culture.

Story continues below advertisement

As The Independent notes, it’s been credited in South Korea with the growing education gap between men and women — nearly three-fourths of Korean women pursue higher education today, compared with less than two-thirds of men, allowing women to entertain the possibility of a life where they are not reliant on a male spouse.

South Korea also has the lowest birth rate in the world, which continues to fall, a fact that some have attributed to 4B, although no concrete data has been presented to support that theory.

In 2022, President Yoon Suk Yeol blamed feminism for the country’s low birth rate, saying he would increase penalties for false accusations of sexual crimes, and denied the existence of “structural discrimination based on gender.”

The previous year, he also accused feminist movements of “blocking healthy relationships” between men and women in the nation.

Story continues below advertisement

What’s driving American interest in 4B?

It’s no secret that women’s rights are increasingly under threat in the United States, and Trump’s re-election was seen by many as a referendum on women’s rights that now has them afraid for what the next four years might hold.

With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, combined with many in Trump’s administration being opposed to abortion, there’s fear that the U.S. could soon face a federal abortion ban and other dwindling reproductive rights.

Many believe Trump has been “strategically abiguous” on his position on abortion, especially during this most recent election. During his campaign he said he would not support a federal ban and wants to leave the issue up to the states.

Story continues below advertisement

However, he also used this year’s campaign to repeatedly frame the overturning of Roe v. Wade as an accomplishment no other Republican could claim.

“For 54 years, they were trying to get Roe v. Wade terminated. And I did it,” he told a Fox News town hall in January. “And I’m proud to have done it.”


A far-right policy agenda known as Project 2025, a sprawling manifesto published in April 2023 by conservative think-thank The Heritage Project that claimed to speak for no presidential candidate, takes a hard line on criminalizing abortion drugs and many fear it will become the playbook Republicans use for the next four years.

Project 2025 would also deny federal healthcare providers from practicing gender-affirming care for transgender people and eliminate insurance coverage for the morning-after pill, arguing that it is an abortion drug.

While the book never explicitly says that abortion should be criminalized as a whole, the project contends that life begins at conception and its policies would make an abortion virtually inaccessible for many.

Despite Trump saying he has “no idea who is behind” Project 2025, journalist Judd Legum was first to report that 31 out of the 38 people who helped write and edit the book served in Trump’s administration or were nominated to positions in it.

Story continues below advertisement

Many also feel that gender inequality has become a major problem in the U.S., pointing to the pay gap — women working full-time, on average, earn 84 cents for every dollar made by a man.

This election cycle saw a whole group of Gen Z voters become newly familiar with Trump’s “grab ’em by the p—“ remarks about women from a leaked Access Hollywood video that made headlines in 2016. And, just last week, he told rally supporters he would “protect” women “whether the women like it or not.”


Trump rally widely criticized for his allies’ crude, racist remarks


If the 4B movement does gain a foothold in the U.S., it has the potential to backfire, some experts warn.

“It would create a further divide between women and men, leading men to be even more disgruntled, and perhaps an even more misogynist culture,” Sarah Liu, a senior lecturer in Gender and Politics at the University of Edinburgh, told Newsweek.

Story continues below advertisement

“As American men are grappling with the shift in gender roles, which has been one of the reasons why they’ve voted for conservative leaders like Trump, women’s agency in partaking in the U.S.-version of the 4B movement would further confirm their beliefs that their masculinity is threatened and that they need to take back the control of women.”

“It’s also important to remember that while Trump’s major supporters are men, many women, particularly white women, also voted for Trump. So the 4B movement might further this impression that men are the major force behind Trump’s election, ignoring the role white women play.”

Katharine Moon, a political science professor at Wellesley College, told the New York Times that even if the 4B movement picks up long-term traction in the U.S., it would surely look different than in South Korea due to cultural differences.

Story continues below advertisement

In South Korea, she explained, marriage is considered central to existence as an adult and “until very recently, being a social adult — not coming-of-age at 18 or such but being a socially recognized adult — marriage was mandated.” Essentially, not being married as a woman in South Korea can result in one becoming a social pariah.

“It’s a temporary means (in the U.S.) to bring attention to the precarious situation of women, with Trump and his ascending to power,” she said. “So it’s not really about a total commitment to a way of life without men. Whereas in South Korea, it is a way of life.”

Curator Recommendations





Source link

According to Trump, mass deportations have no price tag. Trump claims “no price tag” for large-scale deportations.

0
#image_title
#image_
title

Declining on his campaign promise of mass deportation of illegal immigrants, US President-elect Donald Trump has doubled down that the cost of doing so would not be a deterrent.

In some of his first public comments upon election victory, Trump declared that his top focus upon becoming office in January will be to make the border “strong and powerful”.

“There is no price tag question here. Actually, Trump told NBC News, we have little option.

“People who have slain and murdered, drug lords who have devastated nations, and now they are returning to those nations since they are not living here. There is no tag on price.

His vice-president-elect JD Vance had claimed they would start with one million, although his campaign has offered different estimates as to how many could be eliminated.

During Thursday’s phone interview with NBC, Trump largely attributed his immigration stance for helping him to win the race.

“They want borders, and they like people coming in, but they have to come in with love for the country,” he remarked. They have to arrive legally.

Expelling so many people simultaneously presents major legal and logistical difficulties, according to experts.

With families ripped apart and raids occurring in towns and businesses all throughout the US, immigration supporters have also cautioned on the human cost of deportations.


Identify the legal challenges.

#image_title

Based on the most recent estimates from the Department of Homeland Security and Pew
Research, there are around 11 million illegal immigrants living in the US right
now—a count that has stayed rather constant since 2005.

Most live here long-term; over four-fifths have been in the nation for more
than ten years.

Immigrants without legal status have rights including due process, which
includes a judicial hearing prior to their deportation. A sharp rise in
deportations would probably mean a significant expansion in the immigration
court system, which has been afflicted with backlogs.

Most immigrants already in the nation join the deportation system through local
law enforcement rather than Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice)
officials.

But several of the biggest towns and counties in the US have approved rules
prohibiting local police cooperation with Ice.

Trump has promised to strike against these “sanctuary cities,” but
the patchwork of municipal, state, and federal regulations that America boasts
complicates the matter.

Policy expert Kathleen Bush-Joseph of the Washington-based Migration Policy
Institute, or MPI, said that any major deportation scheme would depend
critically on cooperation between Ice and local authorities.

“It’s much easier for Ice to pick someone out from a jail if local law
enforcement co-operates, instead of having to go look for them,” she
remarked.

Ms. Bush-Joseph cited, for instance, an early August announcement from
Florida’s Broward and Palm Beach counties that they would not assign deputies
to assist any mass deportation scheme.

“There are many others who would not co-operatively support a Trump mass
deportation scheme,” she remarked. “That makes it rather more
difficult.”

Any mass deportation initiative is therefore likely to be almost immediately
greeted with a flurry of court challenges from immigration and human rights
campaigners.

However, a 2022 Supreme Court decision indicates that courts cannot provide
injunctions on immigration enforcement policies, so they would continue even as
the challenges traverse the judicial system.

Getty Images is Ice agents pulling a migrant from a Los Angeles raid in
September 2022Gettyimages
Ice enforcement further from the borders usually concentrates on suspects with
criminal records rather than recently arriving immigrants.

Can that be done, practically though?

#image_title


Authorities would still have to deal with great logistical difficulties even if a US
government could lawfully proceed with ideas for mass deportations.

Under the Biden administration, deportations have concentrated on freshly
arrested border migrants. Most of the migrants deported from further inland in
the US from locations not close to the border are those with criminal histories
or judged national security concerns.

Suspended in 2021 were controversial raids on locations used under the Trump
presidency.

Unlike those at the border, deportations of persons caught in the US interior
have hovered at below 100,000 for a decade, following a high in early years of
the Obama administration.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director of the American Immigration Council,
told the BBC “To raise that, in a single year, up to a million would
require a massive infusion of resources that likely don’t exist.”

First of all, analysts question whether Ice’s 20,000 agents and support staff
would be sufficient to locate and follow even a quarter of the numbers the
Trump campaign is touting.

Mr. Reichlin-Melnick further pointed out that the deportation process is
lengthy and convoluted and starts only with the identification and arrest of an
illegal immigrant.

Following that, inmates would have to be housed or placed on a
“alternative to detention” program before they are presented before
an immigration court inside a system with a years-long backlog.

Then detainees are taken out of the US; this process calls for diplomatic
cooperation from the recipient nation.

“In each of those areas, Ice simply does not have the capacity to process
millions of people,” Mr Reichlin-Melnick remarked.

Trump has declared he would assist with deportations using the National Guard
or other US military personnel.

Historically, the US military’s involvement in immigration concerns has been
restricted to support roles near the US-Mexico border.

Apart from the military and “using local law enforcement,” Trump has
not specifically addressed how such a major deportation scheme could be
executed.

The former president also merely in an interview with Time magazine earlier
this year that he would “not rule out” establishing new migrant
detention camps and that he would move to provide police protection from
prosecution from “the liberal groups or the progressive groups”.

He also mentioned that those who do not “won’t partake in the riches”
and that incentives for state and municipal police organisations to engage
could exist.

“We have to do this,” he insisted. “For our nation, this is not
a sustainable issue.”

Research director Eric Ruark of NumbersUSA, a proponent of stricter immigration
restrictions, argued that any deportation initiative from the interior would
only be successful if combined with more border security.

“That has to take front stage. If that isn’t the case, you’re going to
achieve very little internal development,” he remarked. “That’s what
drives people’s consistent attendance.”

Mr. Ruark also mentioned that it would be essential to concentrate on
businesses employing illegal immigrants.

“They’re coming for work,” he remarked. “And they’re getting
those jobs since internal enforcement has basically been destroyed.”

Getty pictures October 2023 immigrants checking in for a deportation flight to
VenezuelaGetty photos
Even small increases in the number of immigrants taken from the US would call
for major funding and other resources.


The political and budgetary expenses


The
entire cost of one million or more deportations, according to experts, would
run in tens or maybe hundreds of billions of dollars.

In 2023 the Ice budget for deportation and transportation came to $420m
(£327m). That year the government deported somewhat more than 140,000 persons.

While awaiting court hearings or deportations, thousands of immigrants would be
arrested; the Trump campaign has envisioned creating huge camps to keep them
all.

Additionally greatly enlarged would be the number of removal flights, maybe
needing military aircraft to increase present capacity.

Any one of these categories could have major expenses with a minor expansion.

Mr. Reichlin-Melnick stated, “even a minor change is in the tens of
millions, or hundreds of millions.” “A noteworthy shift is in the
tens or hundreds of millions.”

These expenses would be on top of the other border security initiatives Trump
has promised: ongoing construction of a southern US border wall, a naval
blockade to stop fentanyl from entering the US, and deploying thousands of
troops to the border.

From a public relations sense, “nightmarish images” of mass
deportations might potentially cost a possible Trump government politically,
according to migration and border specialist Adam Isacson from the Washington
Office on Latin America.

Every American town would witness people they know and love boarding buses, Mr.
Isacson remarked.

“You would have some quite terrible images on TV of crying children, and
families,” he said. “That is really terrible press all around. Family
separation; but, on steroids.”


Have mass deportations ever occurred?

About
1.5 million people were deported under the four years of the former Trump
government from the US interior as well as the border.

Statistics indicate the Biden government, which had deported almost 1.1 million
people up until February 2024, is on target to match that.

More than three million people were deported during the two Obama terms, while
Mr Biden was vice-president, which led some proponents of immigration reform to
label Barack Obama the “deporter-in-chief”.

The only historical analogy to a mass deportation campaign happened in 1954,
when Operation Wetback—named for a disparaging epithet then usually used
against Mexican citizens—sent as many as 1.3 million people backcountry.

Historians disagree with that statistic, though.

Under President Dwight Eisenhower, the program faced significant public
opposition as well as financial constraints and some US citizens were also
deported. It was basically dropped by 1955.

Experts on immigration claim that the previous operation’s emphasis on Mexican
nationals and lack of due process makes it unlike what a contemporary mass
deportation campaign would look like.

“Those [deported in the 1950s] were single, Mexican men,” said
Kathleen Bush-Joseph of MPI.

“Today, most persons arriving between ports of entrance come from
locations outside of Mexico, or perhaps northern Central America. Returning
them is far more difficult, she said.

“Those are not comparable scenarios.”

Why might coffee improve your health?

0
#image_title

Coffee used to be linked in former times to higher health hazards. However, studies published in the past ten years indicate that coffee drinking can even improve your health.

Among psychoactive drugs, caffeine is the most often used one worldwide. For millennia, people have been sipping coffee, a natural source of caffeine; nevertheless, for decades there have been conflicting opinions regarding its impact on human health.

#image_t
itle

“Traditionally, coffee has been seen as a bad thing,” says Marc Gunter, Imperial College London’s cancer epidemiologist and past head of the area of nutrition and metabolism at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). “Research from the 1980s and 90s concluded that people who drank coffee had a higher risk of cardiovascular disease; but, it’s evolved since then.”

Gunter notes that scientists now have data from hundreds of thousands of coffee-drinkers as more, more extensive population studies starting over the past decade surface. What does the research reveal, though, and is coffee use either posing hazards or health advantages?

Because it includes acrylamide, a carcinogen present in foods such toast, cakes and chips, coffee has been linked with a higher risk of cancer. The IARC came to the conclusion in 2016, nonetheless, that coffee is not carcinogenic unless consumed extremely hot, above 65C (149F). Researchers in a 2023 review contend that although coffee is one of the main causes of acrylamide in our diets, there is not yet a robust, clear evidence foundation demonstrating how it relates to cancer risk.

#image_title

The possible medical advantages of coffee drinking

Moreover, numerous studies have indicated that coffee could possibly have a protective impact. For instance, several studies have found a relationship between coffee intake and a reduced risk of various cancers in individuals.

Gunter released the findings of a study examining half a million individuals’s coffee-drinking patterns over sixteen years throughout Europe in 2017. Coffee drinkers ran less risk of dying from cancer, stroke, and heart disease. These results line up with studies conducted elsewhere, including the US, and more recent UK study as well.

Based on observational studies, Gunter claims there is enough agreement to validate that those who consume up to four cups of coffee daily have less ailments than those who abstain from.

The possible advantages of coffee could stretch further. Gunter’s study found that coffee-drinkers had worse diets and were more likely to smoke than non-coffee drinkers. This would imply that, should coffee reduce the risk of cancer and heart disease, it may be more potent than we would have imagined, therefore negating the influence of bad habits.

#image_title

That is true whether you have caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee. Research indicates that decaf coffee has comparable levels of antioxidants than regular coffee. Gunter concluded that the health advantages connected with coffee are attributable to something else than caffeine as he observed in his studies no variations between the health of people who drank caffeinated versus decaf.

Why do we not truly understand how coffee influences our health?

All of this study, meanwhile, was grounded in demographic data, which does not establish cause and effect.

Coffee drinkers could just have better underlying health than those who decide against drinking it.

Coffee drinkers could just have better underlying health than those who choose not to, claims Peter Rogers, a University of Bristol researcher on the impact of caffeine on behavior, mood, alertness and attention. That is in spite of their less healthy living choices, as Gunter’s studies reveal.

“Some people suggested there might be a protective effect, which is somewhat controversial as it’s based on population evidence,” he explains.

Regular coffee drinkers also typically have greater blood pressure, which should raise their risk of cardiovascular disease. Rogers notes, though, there is no data linking increased blood pressure from coffee use to increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

#image_title

Rarer than population studies are clinical trials looking at coffee, which could better ascertain its advantages and drawbacks. One experiment, however, was carried out by a group of academics where they watched how consuming caffeinated coffee affected blood sugar.

Under the direction of England’s University of Bath’s Centre for Nutrition Exercise and Metabolism, the tiny study examined how coffee alters the body’s reaction to breakfast following a broken night’s sleep. Participants who had coffee, then a sugary drink in place of breakfast, had a 50% increase in blood sugar when compared to when they skipped coffee before “breakfast”.

Still, for the risk to mount, this kind of behavior must occur often over time.

Gettyimages It’s hard to tell exactly how laboratory research relates to everyday life. Credit: Getty Images.Getty Photographs

It’s hard to determine exactly how laboratory research relates to actual life (Credit: Getty Images).

Indicating that neither population, nor lab research can offer conclusive answers on how coffee influences human health, putting people into laboratory environments also raises the issue of how relevant the results are to real life.

Can coffee make a miscarriage more likely?

Advice on how much caffeine one should drink is especially perplexing during pregnancy. Coffee intake both before and throughout pregnancy has been linked, according one 2022 assessment of data, to misscarriage. The researchers argue, however, that given their focus on population studies, there could be other reasons for the observed correlation between coffee intake and pregnancy loss. For instance, smoking is linked to coffee intake, they report, and is well known to raise misscarriage risk.

Reviewing 380 studies, dietician Esther Myers, chief executive of EF Myers Consulting, came to the conclusion that four cups of coffee daily for adults and three for pregnant women shouldn’t cause any negative consequences.

Pregnant and nursing women should not have more than one to two cups of coffee daily, the Food Standard Agency counsels. Based on earlier research, pregnant women should completely avoid coffee in order to lower their stillbirth, low birth weight, and miscarriage risk.

#image_title

Economist Emily Oster, author of the book Expecting Better, which examines the facts on pregnancy advice, also discovered conflicting direction about coffee.

“The major worry is the possibility that caffeine intake links to miscarriage, especially in the first three months,” she explains.

She does, however, note that there is not much randomised evidence on this and that inferences from observational data are unreliable.

“Women who sip coffee during pregnancy are more likely to smoke and are probably older. We know that greater rates of miscarriage are causally related to age and tobacco use,” she notes.

“The second concern is that early pregnancy’s nauseated ladies are less likely to miscarry. Many women who experience nausea and avoid coffee are less likely to miscarry since it’s the kind of item that irritates you if you’re already feeling bad.”

Coffee consumption has no net benefit for our capacity to operate effectively as we grow resistant to its effects – Peter Rogers

Two to four cups of coffee a day, Oster notes, seem unrelated to a higher risk of miscarriage.

And regarding caffeine addiction?

Apart from the possible consequences on heart health, cancer, and miscarriage, coffee affects the brain and nervous system as well. Considered a psychotropic substance, caffeine influences our cognition.

While some members of the general public drink caffeinated coffee all day long, others start to get nervous after one cup. Studies have shown that variations in our DNA can influence how differently two people absorb caffeine. Myers contends, however, “we don’t understand why one person is perfectly fine with a level of caffeine and another person is not”.

For frequent drinkers, meantime, there is bad news for those who sip coffee to increase focus.

Rogers states “as the body gets used to receiving caffeine on a daily basis, there are physiological changes that adapt the body to live with caffeine and maintain normal function.” “Consuming coffee generates no net benefit to our ability to work efficiently because we become tolerant to that effect; but, as long as you keep consuming it, you’re probably not worse off.”

#image_title

He argues, the only people who could benefit from caffeine are those who do not drink it consistently.

On the other side of the spectrum, many people jest about being coffee addicts. Generally speaking, though, they are just dependant, claims Rogers.

“There’s a low risk of addiction to caffeine – if you take it away from someone, they don’t feel great but they’re not strongly craving it,” he notes.

He argues coffee shows the difference between dependency, in which the user’s cognitive ability is compromised but they do not go to great measures to get the drug, and addiction, in which the user is driven to get the substance.

He thinks the only thing coffee consumers need be conscious of is withdrawal. ” Anyone who consumes a couple daily cups of coffee depends on caffeine. They would be fatigued and might perhaps have a headache if you took their coffee away, Rogers notes.

Though they often last three days or a week, he explains, these symptoms depend on the amount of coffee the individual was consuming; so, caffeine is the only thing likely to help.

Does the sort of coffee count?

#image_title

Whether you carefully prepare your coffee from bean to cup or toss some instant powder into a mug, your method of brewing it seems to have little bearing on the connection with greater health. Gunter discovered by researching people all throughout Europe that different kinds of coffee still had health advantages.

“People drank a smaller espresso in Italy and Spain; in northern Europe, people drank more instant coffee and larger volumes of coffee,” notes Gunter. “We looked at many kinds of coffee and saw consistent results across counties, which suggests it’s not about types of coffee but coffee-drinking per se.”

Still, researchers from a 2018 study revealed that the association between coffee and lifespan was stronger for ground coffee than for instant or decaf; although these were still shown to be healthier than not drinking any coffee at all. The gap, the study notes, could be due to quick coffees having less bioactive chemicals, particularly polyphenols, well-known for their anti-inflammatory action.

All varieties of coffee, including decaffeinated, instant and ground, are linked, according a 2021 population study, to a lower risk of chronic liver disease. In another 2022 study, however, researchers discovered that although these three varieties of coffee were all related to lower levels of cardiovascular disease and death, two to three cups of decaf coffee daily had the largest drop in risk of death from all causes.

Gunter says the available, current data indicates drinking up to four cups of coffee a day could offer health benefits, including reduced risk of heart disease and cancer, even as it might not get you through a hectic day at work.

“It’s common sense that if you drink too much of anything it’s probably not good for you; but, there’s no strong evidence that drinking a few cups a day is bad for health.” he says. ” If anything, it’s the opposite.”

The Véloroute Gourmande: Canada’s mouthwatering 235 km culinary path

0
#image_title

This Content Is Only For Subscribers

Please subscribe to unlock this content. Enter your email to get access.
Your email address is 100% safe from spam!

For China, Middle East, and Ukraine, what does Trump’s victory mean?For China, Middle East, and Ukraine, what does Trump’s victory mean?

0
#image_title
#image_title

With violence and instability engulfing portions of the globe, Donald Trump’s return to the White House promises perhaps dramatic changes on several fronts, so transforming US foreign policy.

Based on ideas of non-interventionism and trade protectionism, sometimes without particular details, Trump made broad policy pledges during his campaign – or as he puts it “America First”.

In the middle of concurrent crises, his triumph marks one of the most important possible upheavals in Washington’s foreign policy over many years.

From his remarks on the campaign trail and his track record in office from 2017 to 2021, we can put parts of his anticipated approach to various regions together.

Track real-time election day developments as Trump triumphs.

#image_title

Whichever state each voted for?

Examining why the US granted Trump another opportunity
He takes office as US president when?
Now, what becomes of Trump’s legal cases?
Though it’s unclear how far the former advisers’ paper reflects Trump’s own ideas, it will probably provide some direction on the kind of counsel he should obtain.

Originally established as a barrier against the Soviet Union, his “America First” approach to ending the conflict also addresses the geopolitical question of the future of NATO, the transatlantic all-for-one and one-for-all military alliance built up following World conflict Two.

Reuters is Amid Russia’s invasion on Ukraine, a homeowner checks his apartment building hit by a Russian drone strike in the town of Krasylivka, Chernihiv area, Ukraine, 3 November 2024.REuters
In February 2022 Russia started a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Now numbering thirty-two countries, Trump has long been a critic of the alliance, charging Europe of free-riding on America’s offer of protection.

Still up for contention is whether he would really pull the US out of NATO, therefore indicating the most dramatic change in transatlantic defense relations in almost a century.

Some of his supporters claim his strict policies are only a negotiation ploy meant to compel

members to follow alliance defense expenditure policies.

The truth is, though, NATO officials will be particularly concerned about how his triumph would affect the alliance’s future and about how unfriendly leaders view its deterrent power.

Middle Eastern history

As with Ukraine, Trump has promised to bring “peace” to the Middle East – indicating he would stop the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and the Israel-Hezbollah war in Lebanon – but he has not stated just how.

According to him, Hamas would not have attacked Israel if he had been in office instead of Joe Biden because of his “maximum pressure” strategy on Iran, which supports the group.

Broadly, Trump would probably want to go back to the approach, which saw his government withdraw the US out of the Iran nuclear agreement, apply more sanctions against Iran and murder Gen Qasem Soleimani – Iran’s most formidable military commander.

Strongly pro-Israel measures were passed by Trump in the White House, designating Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and shifting the US embassy there from Tel Aviv, so energising Trump’s Christian evangelical constituency, a fundamental Republican voter base.

Calling Trump the “best friend Israel has ever had in the White House,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

Critics counter his approach had a destabilising impact on the area.

Washington’s denial of their claim to Jerusalem, the city that forms the historical center of national and religious life for Palestinians, led the Palestinians to boycott the Trump administration.

Views of US elections by Israelis and Palestinians
US requests a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah.
Their isolation grew even more pronounced when Trump mediated the so-called “Abraham Accords,” which resulted in a historic agreement normalizing diplomatic relations between Israel and numerous Arab and Muslim nations. Previously a prerequisite of Arab nations for such a regional deal, they accomplished this without Israel having to accept a future independent Palestinian state alongside it – the so-called two-state solution.

Instead of recognition of Israel, the nations engaged were granted access to superior US weaponry in return.

The
only power that can truly apply leverage to both sides in the conflict put the
Palestinians at one of the most isolated times in their history, therefore
undermining their capacity as seen from the ground.

During the campaign, Trump expressed multiple remarks declaring he wanted the
fighting in Gaza to stop.

Though he has had a complicated, perhaps dysfunctional relationship with
Netanyahu, he most definitely has the power to press him.

He also has close ties to leaders of the important Arab nations who interact
with Hamas.

It’s unknown how he would balance seeking to end the war with his want to
display great support for the Israeli government.

Although Trump’s backers have often presented his erratic behavior as a
diplomatic advantage, it is difficult to see how this would play out in the
highly divided and unstable Middle East amid a crisis already of historical
proportions.

Trump will have to determine how – or whether – to progress the halted
diplomatic process started by the Biden administration to get a Gaza truce in
return for the release of the captives kept by Hamas.


Trade and China


America’s
approach to China is its most strategically significant foreign policy one,
with most effects on commerce and world security.

Trump declared China a “strategic competitor” while in office and
levies taxes on some Chinese shipments into the US. Beijing started
tit-for–tat tariffs on American products in response.

Although attempts were made to defuse the trade conflict, the Covid epidemic
eliminated this prospect, and relations deteriorated as the former president
called Covid a “Chinese virus”.

Although the Biden administration promised to approach China policy more
responsibly, it did in fact maintain many of the Trump-era tariffs on imports.



What US Chinese citizens desire?


Though much of the long-term jobs decline in traditional US industries like steel have been as much about factory automation and production changes as global competitiveness and offshoring, the trade policy has become tightly linked to domestic voter perceptions in the US about protecting American manufacturing jobs.

Trump has hailed Chinese President Xi Jinping as both “brilliant” and “dangerous,” a highly successful leader wielding a “iron fist” over 1.4 billion people—a reflection of what critics labeled as Trump’s respect for “dictators.”

In an effort to limit China, the former president most certainly will veer from the Biden administration’s strategy of forging closer US security alliances with other regional nations.

China regards as a renegade colony under ultimate sovereignty, the US has maintained military support for self-ruled Taiwan.

Trump declared in October that he would not have to use military action to stop a Chinese blockade of Taiwan should he return to the White House since President Xi knew he was “[expletive] crazy” and would apply paralysing tariffs on Chinese goods should that occur.







Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com